Photo de Mariannick Bourguet-Chassagnon

Mariannick Bourguet-Chassagnon

Maître de conférences, Droit public.

Université Lorraine · IAE Nancy School of Management Institut de Recherches sur l'Évolution de la Nation et de l'État — IRENEE
Université de LorraineIAE Nancy School of ManagementInstitut de Recherches sur l'Évolution de la Nation et de l'État

Responsabilités

Responsabilités administratives et scientifiques

  • En détachement au T.A. de Versailles

Publications scientifiques

  • Thèse

    THESE
    La justice et le régime de Vichy : contribution à la notion d'indépendance en droit public français, soutenue en 2005 à Reims sous la direction de Michel Degoffe et Antoine Astaing 

    The study concerns the Justice in France from 1940 till 1944. The government of Vichy as soon as July 1940 abolished the organic independence of the judiciary, in particular by the suspension of the irremovability, in order to transform magistrates into partisans of the regime. It also tries to stop the power of interpretation of the jurisdictions, thanks to retroactive penal laws and to jurisdictions of exception. For their part, the authorities of occupation do not respect the principle of non bis idem and support the competence of the German military jurisdictions, in regardless of the binding force of the res judicata, with the aim of increasing the penal repression for the facts of resistance. However, the French Government intends to protect the appearances of the "Etat de droit" and protects, in law, the principle of delegated Justice, and thus the functional independence of magistrates. Therefore, an order sent by the Lord Chancellor to magistrates af the Seat remains illegal, as illustrates it the famous affair of the "section spéciale" of Paris. Besides, the power of interpretation of magistrates remains, for want of the government having restored the legislative emergency proceeding. So the power to judge jurisdictions of exception is increased by the absence of motivation of rulings and the abolition of the ways to appeal, which, paradoxically, sometimes allowed the emergence of decisions which do not conformed to the Governrnent's wishes. On the other hand, the preservation of the procedure of common law Ior the cornmon jurisdictions limits the possibilities of interpretation of the anti-Semitic legislations.

  • Ouvrages

    Mariannick Bourguet-Chassagnon, Michel Degoffe, Antoine Astaing, La justice et le régime de Vichy: contribution à la notion d'indépendance en droit public français,, 2005, 653 p.