# Feminist Judgments in International Law - Portail Universitaire du droit > Source : [Portail Universitaire du Droit](https://univ-droit.fr) > URL : https://univ-droit.fr/recherche/actualites-de-la-recherche/parutions/32773-feminist-judgments-in-international-law > Description : feminist judgments in international law, présentation de l'éditeur the emergence of feminist rewriting of key judgments has been one of the most interesting ... ## Parution - **ISBN** : 978-1-509-91445-6 - **Éditeur** : Hart ## Résumé Présentation de l'éditeur The emergence of feminist rewriting of key judgments has been one of the most interesting recent developments in legal methodology. This unique enterprise has seen scholars collaborate in the 'real world' task of reassessing jurisprudence in light of feminist perspectives.  This important new volume makes a significant contribution to the endeavour, exploring how key judgments in international law might have differed if feminist judges had sat on the bench.  This collection asks whether feminist perspectives can offer meaningful and viable alternatives to international law norms; and if so, whether that application results in distinguishable differences in outcomes. It answers these questions with particular reference to sources of international law, the public and private divide, State responsibility, State immunities, treaty law, State sovereignty, human rights protection, global governance, and the concept of violence in international law. This landmark publication offers a truly innovative reassessment of international law.   Sommaire PART I - INTRODUCTION 1. Feminist Judgments in International Law: An Introduction Loveday Hodson and Troy Lavers PART II - GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW Permanent Court of International Justice 2. Bozkurt Case, aka the Lotus Case (France v Turkey ): Ships that Go Bump in the Night Christine Chinkin, Gina Heathcote, Emily Jones and Henry Jones International Court of Justice 3. Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Kasey McCall-Smith, Rhona Smith and Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko 4. The Lockerbie Case (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v United States of America) Kathryn Greenman and Troy Lavers 5. Germany v Italy Zoi Aliozi, Bérénice K. Schramm and Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko Court of Justice of the European Union 6. Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others Marta Carneiro, Kirsten Ketscher and Freya Semanda PART III - HUMAN RIGHTS European Court of Human Rights 7. Christine Goodwin v the United Kingdom Sara Bengtson, Damian Gonzalez-Salzberg, Loveday Hodson and Paul Johnson 8. Leyla Sahin v Turkey Amel Alghrani, Amal Ali and Jill Marshall 9. Burden v the United Kingdom Nicola Barker 10. Opuz v Turkey Shazia Choudhry and Jonathan Herring 11. A, B and C v Ireland Helen Fenwick, Wendy Guns and Ben Warwick 12. Ruusunen v Finland Merris Amos, Maribel Canto-Lopez and Nani Jansen Reventlow Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 13. Cecilia Kell v Canada Lolita Buckner Inniss, Jessie Hohmann and Enzamaria Tramontana PART IV - INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW Special Court for Sierra Leone 14. AFRC Trial Judgment (Prosecutor v Brima, Kamara and Kanu ) Olga Jurasz, Sheri Labenski, Solange Mouthaan and Dawn Sedman International Criminal Court 15. The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Yassin M Brunger, Emma Irving and Diana Sankey International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 16. Prosecutor v Radovan Karadžic Celestine Greenwood PART V - CONCLUSION 17. Prefiguring Feminist Judgment in International Law Hilary Charlesworth ## Métadonnées - **Catégorie** : Parutions - **Publié** : 2019-09-18 --- *Portail Universitaire du Droit — [univ-droit.fr](https://univ-droit.fr)*